I’m reading Richard Sennet’s The Craftsman. I’m intrigued by the idea he explores, “The desire to do a job well for its own sake-as a template for living.” It hasn’t been easy reading, very heavy in philosophy with frequent meanderings through personal experience but I’m determined to get into the meatier bits of the book. So far, I’ve especially enjoyed the following passage:
All craftsmanship is founded on skill developed to a high degree. By one commonly used measure, about ten thousand hours of experience are required to produce a master carpenter or musician. Various studies show that as skill progresses, it becomes more problem attuned…whereas people with primitive levels of skill struggle more exclusively on getting things to work. At its higher reaches, technique is no longer a mechanical activity; people can feel fully and think deeply (about) what they are doing once they do it well….
The emotional rewards craftsmanship holds out for attaining skill are twofold: people are anchored in tangible reality, and they can take pride in their work. But society has stood in the way of these rewards in past and continues to do so today. At different moments in Western history practical activity has been demeaned , divorced from supposedly higher pursuits. Technical skill has been removed from imagination, tangible reality doubted by religion, pride in one’s work treated as a luxury. If the craftsman is special because he or she is an engaged human being, still the craftsman’s aspitations anf trials hold up a mirror to these larger issues past and present.
Soon after copying this into my notebook, I came across a status update from Mr. Habib saying:
‘takes 10 000 hours to achieve mastery in a field,based on studies of masters in their field.’ Malcom Gladwell on @radio702′
‘takes 10 000 hours to achieve mastery in a field,based on studies of masters in their field.’ Malcom Gladwell on @radio702′
It’s a freaky set of co-incidences that prove all the world is a text. And the process of meaning of one text is shaped directly, or indirectly, by a number of other diverse texts.